And where is the truly radical thought located? In moments, in cultural experience, in dissonance and approaching harmony. For sustainability such thinking has real results. For academics it is cause to paint me a relativist, yet, as perhaps only Rorty seems willing to admit since Dewey more clearly grasped Pierce than James’ well-intentioned abuses, it is a silly way of talking to someone, calling them names in this way, and if we must then consider relativism is positivism since the scientific method is slim on inherent value (truth) but fat on consequence:
“positive science can only rest on experience; and experience can never result in absolute certainty” – Pierce
There is no approaching the ideal of truth; it is more like recalling a dream to a friend, and the friend agreeing on the feeling, the tone of the dream – truth seems as vaporous and intimate.
I’d like to have a conversation here with educators, teachers by profession and calling, committed to their craft, and the various slight of hand ethics we must today take up to justify one of the oldest professions in a civilization where to be politically correct is to be at all times politically neutral…
* first image School of Aristotle, fresco of Gustav Spangenberg

No comments:
Post a Comment